Where else does the apostle say something quite like that? Judge in yourselves. Paul! You usually give us an authoritative statement.
Remember the rule of God in marriage. Oh that Christian husbands and wives were really bound together in love and mutual respect and appreciation, the wife deferring gladly to the husband, as and when necessary, his helper his support; the husband, with full respect and acknowledgement and understanding of his wife, exercising his leadership – as Christ exercised his life and leadership – with gentleness and love and affection.
Interestingly, that is what John Calvin said. In his commentary on these passages – and he lived in an age where the ladies needed to wear head coverings, and it did have symbolism; it did have a message – quite candidly, he says in so many words, this is cultural. It is a principle, a permanent principle while time lasts, that there are roles distributed to men and women. But the clothing which symbolises it may change. The Westminster confession of faith doesn't actually say the same, but it practically does, because in the passage where it discusses this and it says, ‘Some things are cultural’, in so many words, one of the proof texts, lo and behold, is this very passage. So the Westminster confession identifies the headgear as cultural. So does the Augsburg confession of the Lutheran Church. So does the famous Geneva Bible – the translation of the Bible, first of all, of course, in Latin and in French and then in English. That was the Bible of the Puritans, or most of them. It has a little footnote, and it indicates this is according to the time and the country: it is cultural. And that is how we consider it today. The principle behind it is binding. The headgear is according to the message of clothing in the time and country in which we live.