The Book of First Samuel now turns to the appointment of Saul as king, and we see what an unlikely king he was. We are given a long introduction to Saul.
We don’t want a monarchy either, or we shouldn't. Monarchy gets into the church in various forms. In the so-called church, the Roman Catholic Church, the king is the pope. He answers in almost every respect to a monarch. And then there are others also. We create things that are somewhat monarchical: synods and centralised ruling systems for denominations. It is all steps towards a monarchy: neglect of the simple New Testament pattern of autonomous individual churches, congregations, under the direct rule of Christ. Any alternative to that is moving in the direction of a form of monarchy. There are independent churches, mega-churches sometimes, and they have a hero, and they virtually worship their hero pastor, and set him on a pedestal, and make him a vastly rich man, and they are very proud to belong to this man’s church. It is nine or ten paces towards monarchy: the very thing we are to avoid.
The word ‘goodly’ doesn't mean good. Goodly means winsome and charming and good looking; highly endowed with everything that you might think was desirable. ‘From his shoulders and upwards he was higher than any of the people.’ Tremendous stature and presence. Actually the more you know about Saul, the more of a failure you see he was, even according to the flesh. He really didn't have anything very much going for him. As far as his being a king was concerned, he was a totally inadequate. That is all you can really say about him. He looked the part, and he had the charm, and great eloquence, and carnally he was just what the people would have wanted. God was going to give them the kind of person that they themselves appreciated and admired.