Once again, the tut-tutting begins: ‘How unwise of Jacob! How foolish of him to show favouritism to one son. By doing this he created this situation and he spoiled the boy, and the other brothers had some grounds to be antagonised on account of Joseph.
Our modern minds are always looking for a cause. Isn't it strange how even Reformed Christians, who believe in the depravity of the human beings, are always looking for some reason why somebody is bad. It can never be their fault; there must have been a cause. Somehow we don't like the idea that they were just bad. These sons had tremendous advantages; they had a godly father, a godly grandfather, a tradition of biblical training, wonderful evidences of the power of God, and yet they went wrong. Why? Because they were bad. Certainly, there were some things that didn't help. Jacob's earlier polygamy didn't help. There was rivalry in the family, but you can't blame it all onto that, and you certainly can't blame it on the father being too fond of the boy, and of Joseph being spoilt. That doesn't make somebody a monster, and murderous. The fact is that you can have the best background imaginable and you can turn out to be utterly depraved. Probably they didn't like separation from the world, because they wanted to experience what it had to offer. They didn't like to have to live with Isaac and Jacob in tents apart from society generally. They didn't like all the devotions and all the reading of the ancient Scriptures.