So Bildad asks, ‘How can man be righteous before God?’ The question is brief but to the point, for this – from the point of view of the three – is still the issue between the comforters and Job. All that Job has said has tended in this direction: that it is possible for a man to be regarded as righteous before God, and furthermore that Job is such a man.
The Biblical scheme of redemption is so different to this. It too recognises the vast gulf between God and man, but is teaches that God is able to bridge this gulf, and have a real relationship with man which is not simply a matter of pretence. Christ has bridged the gulf between us. He has become incarnate in order to relate to those who are far below him, and he has suffered on Calvary to take away their sin. In the covenant of grace God has achieved all of this, and has satisfied even his own exacting requirements. The atonement is an essential and exquisite part of the plan of redemption. It brings together in a real bond the transcendent God and fallen mankind. The relationship between them is subsequently represented as marriage – the closest union on earth. It is represented as a Father-son relationship, another bond of love, which would not be an appropriate description unless God and his elect people had been truly reconciled. The Christian hope is not based on God pretending to be what he is not – as is the liberal hope; it is based on a true reconciliation with God that allows him to embrace the living God as he truly is, and not as one who has been denuded of his essential attributes. We love the justice of God; we love his holiness; we love his transcendence. All these are our friends, and we thank God that, in full acknowledgment of these attributes, we have been united with Christ, and through him with the whole God head. Bildad’s observations are true but irrelevant and intended to lead to a false conclusion.