But then he adds this illustration. He speaks to them as if they were simpletons, children in the kindergarten class.
‘The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do.’ What does he mean? Does he mean he is less divine than the Father? No, that is not implied. It means simply this, the Son is equal with the Father, but he will never act independently of the Father - that is the meaning of the words. ‘The Son can do nothing of himself,’ not, the Son cannot do anything unless the Father infuses into him the power. The sense is, the Son would never do anything of which the Father didn’t approve – and, come to that, the Holy Spirit didn’t approve – because there is one God, three Persons in one Godhead, equally divine, but working in complete harmony. No conceivable disagreement between them. Their views are one, and their views are perfect. Furthermore, The Son of God has come in human flesh. He has become a representative man, with many limitations. And therefore he is establishing that he is more than that, he is divine, and he is aware, as the Son of God, though he is seen in the weakness of human flesh, he is totally aware of what the Father thinks, and what the Father desires. So the Father shows him everything and he sees the Father’s will.