As Christ’s criticism in Matthew 23 shows, the Pharisees had developed the practice of distinguishing between one oath and another, so that they taught that an oath was either more or less binding depending on what a man swore by. ‘Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! 17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? 18 And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty’ (Matthew 23:16-18).
A man’s word should be able to stand without needing to attach an oath to it. It is right that a person should expect others to believe him when he speaks the simple truth, for the truth deserves to be believed. To find it necessary to add an oath every time we speak indicates that there is something wrong with our integrity in the eyes of others, and maybe in our own eyes. We sense that our bare words are not enough to convince, so we constantly add an oath. Is it because we know others have learnt not to trust us due to past lies? The cure of that is not the addition of oaths, but the careful us of ordinary words. We must ban all half lies, all exaggeration, all false elaboration. Before we speak we should consider what we are going to say. We should learn to hate lies because of the damage they do to us.