Throughout the Sermon on the Mount, the Lord not only teaches his disciples how to live, but why they should live in this way. He also teaches us how to think, and these thoughts should be behind our actions.
If our heavenly Father cares for the birds, then how can we think that he will not care for us? It is entirely right that we see ourselves as more important than them. This is not based on pride but on the word of God – the human race alone is made in the image of God. We alone can relate to him, and worship him, and are conscious of his wonderful acts. Man is the only self-conscious creature, and he is the only creature conscious of God. Pink remarks that the birds and other animals are closer to living as they were designed to live, feeding daily from the hand of the Lord, than is mankind, who having the use of means, employs it not in a trustful way, but to make himself independent of his Creator. Our lives do not go on for ever, but he sustains us until our appointed hour. How we thank God for our Saviour, who has come into the world and taught us to see the world as a man of faith! How wonderful are all the small events of life which contribute to our sustenance and which come from the hand of our loving heavenly Father!
Should we abandon all preparation for our future and cease to plan for tomorrow or the day after? No, the Lord has given us the capacity to provide for ourselves to a limited degree and expects us it, but that capacity comes from him and does not make us independent of him. It does not make us any the less reliant on him. It simply makes us creatures who can consciously work with him to bring about the ends he intends – the support of our lives here on earth. Our ability to make use of means, to plan ahead, to prepare, goes to our heads and we foolishly conclude that we have to do everything for ourselves, to run the very universe. A proper humility keeps us in our place, and we can play only a very small part.
What about the carnivorous creatures; their life is sustained only by the death of another of God’s creature. Is this not an argument against the care of God? Has not his care towards the one that perishes failed? No. Scripture does not allow us to reason that way. He sets a limit on each life, and Genesis is very clear that the reason why death is in the world is because of man’s sin, to teach mankind the consequences of disobedience, not because of any failure of God’s providence. They live because he provides for them; they die not because he fails to care for them, but because their allotted time is complete: such is faith’s view of the matter.
How damaging therefore is the doctrine of evolution which undermines all that Scripture teaches about the providence of God. If God did not make the world and every kind of creature in it; if there was always death in the world and life has evolved via countless deaths, then where is the care of the Lord for all he has made? We can understand that God still cares for his creatures even though creation is subject to the curse, but we cannot understand how he could do so if they have always lived under the sentence of death, killing and being killed.